Hi, please

Category Archives: 2-travelogue

Keeping Track of the Web

Okay, so this is going to seem ridiculously out of place among all the third travelogue extravaganzas, but thanks to the flu and some computer issues, I never got the concluding post up for the second travelogue.  So excuse me for the interruption, but I wanted to get it up here so I could sum up some of my thoughts.

Read More »

meghak strikes again…

I hope you all realize that I am sacrificing the good name of “meghak” (it’s my username on Wikipedia too) for these little experiments. Oh the lengths I will go for NMRS…

So I took Mushon’s suggestion and decided to edit an article and “watch” the page to see what edits took place, when, what was said, etc. In honor of Mike’s second travelogue, I planned to mess with Rick Astley’s Wikipedia page. But alas, his page is semi-protected, meaning I’d have to be an established user, which is unlikely, considering my first edit. So I went to the next best option, the Wikipedia page for our favorite song, Never Gonna Give You Up. Here’s my edited post:

You’ll notice on this one I didn’t highlight the edit (and if you seriously can’t find it, it’s the last paragraph). That’s because by the time I realized that I hadn’t and went back to take another screenshot, IT HAD ALREADY BEEN CHANGED.

That’s right, folks. Exactly five minutes later, user Europe22 had deleted my addition to the article, and, quite perceptively, wrote “a joke?” by way of discussion about why he/she had undone my edit.

So there you have it. Wikipedians may not have a sense of humor, but they certainly have a sense of accuracy.

CONTRIBUTE

I’ve switched directions.

I think my new focus for this 2nd Travelogue is a more interesting and more current issue on the internet.

In the heat of this highly contested 2008 Presidential campaign there are two relevant candidates, with each comes a sea of supporters. People of all sorts putting their money toward the candidate they want to see in the White House in 2009.  In this blog I will take you on a tour of the website “FUNDRACE.ORG” and then discuss my feelings on the ethical issues surrounding the site, as well as spending time to celebrate the wonders of this compelling search engine. It is the purpose behind FundRace that might be alarming to some, especially the aforementioned contributors, in this election season. FundRace provides a service that allows anyone with Internet access to look up the exact contributions of PRIVATE CITIZENS.

FundRace has all the bells and whistles as it manages to answer the question “who gave how much exactly to which candidate exactly, when exactly, and exactly how many times?.”

It seems funny that this is about the most transparent matter I can think of on the Internet in regards to election funding, and it only exposes the views and donations of private individuals. It is with certainty we can assume many of the people found on the website FundRace, would not wish to be found there, especially knowing the exact monetary amount of each one of their contributions is available to the open public. This certaintly raises questions as to where information such as this fits in the public sphere of the internet.

Let us get down to business…

The home page of FundRace had grown much more whoreish in my recent visits research for this post, it had been a couple of years since I had last logged on, probably during the 2006 Midterm elections. It seems they realized what lay at the heart of their greatest earning potential… gossip.

Their warm welcome is as follows.

Fundrace 2008

Welcome to FundRace 2008.

Want to know if a celebrity is playing both sides of the fence? Whether that new guy you’re seeing is actually a Republican or just dresses like one? If your boss maxed out at that fundraiser or got comped? Whether your neighbor’s political involvement stops at that hideous lawn sign?

FundRace makes it easy to search by name or address to see which presidential candidates your friends, family, co-workers, and neighbors are contributing to. Or you can see if your favorite celebrity is putting their money where their mouth is.

FundRace gives you the technology to do what politicians and journalists have been doing for years: find out where the money’s coming from, see who it’s going to, and solve the mystery of why that crazy ex-roommate of yours is now the Ambassador to Turks and Caicos.

Damn, that seems pretty spicy for a political resource!

Here’s what I came up with in my carousing about their site.

You call it New Media Research Studio, I’ll research some old media, my middle school computer teacher! Searching my home zip code I was able to browse a well endowed list full of people their donations and their exact address.

Democrat

Laurie Bartels
Donation of $625 to Presidential elections
Democrat
Updated
Q1/2004

John Kerry
$625

Laurie Bartels
Donation of $500 to Presidential elections

Democrat

Updated
Q3/2008

Barack Obama
$500

$1,225 given by this address.
$0 to Republicans $1,225 to Democrats
I only wonder how Mrs. Bartels would feel about how easily I accessed this intimate political information of hers.
FundRace comes equipped with five available search options, so it lends a very helping hand to even the computer illiterate when trying to obtain this information. The Entry Fields are as folllows:
1-Street Address & Zip Code
2-City
3-Last Name & First Name
4-Occupation
5-Employer
Past any ethical questions about the appropriateness of politcal information being public, in the greater scheme of the internet, you must realize the detailed information found on FundRace is sort of alarming. Political Affiliations, Home Addresses, Occupation and/or Employer, and exact monetary figures are all available through FundRace’s simple search.
Check back for comprehensive research on reactions to and operations of FundRace.org.

Widgets Are the Web

There’s a fine line between applications and widgets, and it’s getting smaller every day.  On one hand, we want our software to have all the bells and whistles; for example, Photoshop was once reserved for the professionals who needed it but now every thirteen year old with access to a bit torrent knows how to Photoshop (it’s even a verb!).  

Read More »

Fuck You, I’m Hooked On A Feeling

 Last night I was in a panic. I didn’t know where my travelogue was going. I felt like I hadn’t posted enough. I felt like I didn’t have enough information. Then I realized: the reason my travelogue didn’t scroll through words on a neo-dictionary or swagger into digital jazz clubs looking for love was because it couldn’t. I realized that the answer to my question was every modern college student’s nightmare- an answer that couldn’t be found online. How did I come to this point? It all began with an anteater.

Read More »

Blood-sucking Vampire Widgets

Remember the days when you couldn’t login to Facebook without a cheery message alerting that you’d been bitten? Or for the more polite friends, that you’ve received an invitation to be bitten?  Or something like that?

Then you were probably, like me, under the spell of the Facebook Zombie Application (and maybe later, for the brave souls, the vampire and werewolf varieties of the same app).  You had to turn as many friends into zombies to earn points (read:  the more people that install the application, the better).   Read More »

“The Infinite Canvas”…wtf does that mean?

What are webcomics? What makes them unique? I think I’ve spent so much time assuming that everyone knew what they were that I overlooked defining them, however, I think that this is a fitting way to end this travelogue.

Are webcomics just graphic blogs? Yes and no.

Read More »

Same Day, Different Shift

Define your world. Strong words, friends at Urban Dictionary. Strong words…but you’re kinda right. Read More »

Rick Is Never Gonna Give You (Specifically) Up

So far I’ve covered the bait ‘n switch tactic of online RickRolling, the original form in which the meme spread. What I haven’t addressed (which is integral to my Final Post and that is why I am posting this first.) is when RickRolling leaves the web and enters RL, as Jess would call it.

Sometimes RickRolling leaps off the computer screen and into baseball stadiums, classrooms, and department stores through a variety of media including loudspeakers, boom boxes, and even live singing telegrams. But is RickRolling the same when it leaves it’s comfortable home in cyber space?

In this video, a kid taps into the intercom system at his local Wal Mart, greets customers with the traditional “Attention All Wal Mart Shoppers…” and then plays Astley’s “Never Gonna Give You Up” into the receiver. As it plays over the store’s sound system, you can see customers roaming around in the background, completely unaffected by the act. 

After watching this video, and through extensive personal experience, I’ve decided that RickRolling an unsuspecting person online and RickRolling a general audience in a public venue are completely different. In Internet RickRolling, Rick Astley hijacks your computer screen, and dances and sings through your speakers and on your desktop as a direct result of you clicking a link that appealed specifically to you. So Internet RickRolling is a very personalized experience, in contrast to Offline RickRolling in which a RickRoll doesn’t target any one person looking for any one thing.

While the end result is always the same (that amazing video I’ve watched a bajillion times now), the means by which it gets to you, the environment in which you view it, and the response you have to it are all uniquely you. Who knew that one mainstream YouTube video could get so personal?

The Unorthodox Business Model that is Craigslist


YouTube Direkt

[youtube ]

WATCH: Because it will be the funniest thing you’ve ever watched

WARNING: You’ll Laugh Hysterically

Read More »